Compare And Contrast Three Authors Say About Nature Of “technology`

Author NameCourse NameGuide NameMarch 9 , 2008Technology : Nature and Effects on form and Behavior of OrganizationsIntroductionThe changing nature of engineering has induced m all studies on the relation between engineering and establishment or governingal coordinate to be more particular proposition . As applied science evolves from one take of sophistication to a higher(prenominal) level , it is obvious that the entire gamut of production from design , equipment , procedures , operators , supplies and literal error to the environment under(a)goes changes . It withal follows naturally that much(prenominal) wide-ranging changes atomic human action 18 bound to be reflected in the organization coordinate also . The question here is - to what extent does technology impress or determine organization coordinate ? The three studies under devotion take radically different stands on the appear . age `The Management of Innovation by Burns stoolpigeon (1961 ) asserts that changing technology and securities industry conditions define the commission trunk of each organization , `The Measurement of Organization Structures by DS Pugh (1973 ) states that technology by itself has a very minimal egress on the structure of organizations , especially manufacturing organizations , but combines with opposite contextual dimensions such as size , to exert a tattle cast on the organization structure Charles Perrow (1984 /1999 ) in ` prevalent Accidents , supporting with high-risk Technologies , on the new(prenominal) hand , contends that the bewilder level of sophistication and complexities in technologies absorb led to a authority in which organization structures , however developed or adapt they may be to the changing technological situations , ar unavailing to cope with or handle systems w ith `interactive complexities and potent co! uplingIn some ways , Burns Stalker and Perrow assume that management has a very minimal role to play in the make of organization structure Burns Stalker implies that technology and market conditions or the changes in them almost unpromptedly determine the structure of organizations i .e . organization structure changes in response to changes in technical and market situations .

Perrow takes control out of the hands of military mans gentleman and management in situations that are the result of the intricacies of technology and undercover to the intellect of human beings . Pugh however attributes senior manageme nt with nonsexual capacity to alter the structure of an organization by as much as the combined effects of all other contextual dimensions of the organization itselfBurns Stalker and Perrow describe extreme situations . Pugh adopts a more rational and holistic approach . All organizations conduct be affected by technology and the changes in technology , but technology by itself could hardly lead to intuitive shaping organization structure . It is management that will countenance to understand the technology , its changes and the related implications and mould the organization to serve and adapt effectively to changing environments . The human management mover has to play a decisive and deliberate role in defining and implementing different kinds of organization structure for different types of technology situations taking into consideration not only the technological visible horizon but also all other factors that could affect the organization structureThe optimal or ide al organization structure for either technology situ! ation could in all possibilities not be the standard or...If you want to get a full essay, golf club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper