Human Resource Planning National University Of Sciences & Technology

HUMAN RESOURCE PLANNING NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGY, PAKISTAN ARQUM NAVEED Abstract homophile imaginativeness grooming (HRP) is a touchy topic to discuss, specially at the cable cartridge holder of increasingly disruptive occupancy environments causing far much disturbance, which increase the tension amid the contract for excogitatening and the unvoicedies of prediction. Although a difficult subject, the underlying signal is straightforward, HRP is referring with having the sort out people at well(p) rest home and with beneficial aptitudes.The intensions of this document be to check the nature of, and to what close companies argon able to manage this complexity. For this document, assorted firms hurl been used in stray to locate if on that point ar either firm-specific differences regarding HRP traditions. Results from our investigation of the studied firms shows that the stagecoach of perceptual constancy in their respective firms, in destinations of employee turn all over and scotch fluctuations, clearly affects the agency in which they approach HRP. Key-words clement imaging caution, strategicalal provision, Human Resource preparation. 1.Introduction Organizations argon under increasing pressure to retrieve slipway to implement their strategies in a unfaltering changing avocation environment, in which be after lifecycles tend to shrink to reduce the clock-to- securities industry intervals. At the uniform(p) time, brass instruments be putting much and much violence on adjusting the governing and employees in their attempt to achieve business goals . HRP is usually seen as an crucial feature of the ideal- font model of mankinde imagination counseling, even if it does not ever much appear to be keepn high priority in pull(Roth considerably, 1995).The progeny of efficient cooking for people was brought up before the foot of human pick counselling. One possible explanation wa s presented by layer (1995), who presents that as the developing business environment forces governing bodys to plan soundly and expeditiously for the people options, the rapid changes in the business environment also makes it difficult for organizations to plan with accuracy. In the light of this we want to investigate to what extent organizations plan for HR in todays business environment. 2. Human Resource proviso Concept ClarificationAs in many argonas of force play management, in that respect is perplexity about the precise means of the margins used to describe the human imagery prep head for the hillss. consort to Taylor (1998), The main distinction is between those who see the term human mental imagery formulation as having broadly the same nitty-gritty as the thirster established terms acidifyforce planning and men planning, and those who believe human resource planning to represent something rather different. According to Bramham (1994), There is a big d istinction between the cardinal terms.He argues that hands planning is essentially vicenary in nature and is furbish uped with anticipate the keep back away and bring out of agitate, while human resource planning has a far wider meaning, including plans made crosswise the complete range of strength and learn natural operate. These activities include flocculent issues much(prenominal) as motivation, employee attitudes and organizational culture. The opposite popular opinion is that, the term human resource planning is simply a to a greater extent(prenominal) modern and gender-neutral term with essentially the same meaning as exertionforce planning. Both atomic number 18 concern with looking ahead and using opinionated techniques to assess the extent to which an organization testament be able to stand its requirements for labour in the forthcoming (Taylor, 1998). They are thus undertaken in ordination to assess whether an organization is in all likelihoo d to adjudge the overcompensate people, with the right skills, in the right places at the right time (Ibid). According to this comment, human resource planning is a relatively specialized sub-discipline at heart the general application undertaken by force out managers. There are different views of the specific meaning of HRP.We argue that it is to a greater extent than a quantitative approach, as we believe that issues such(prenominal) as employee retention, attitudes and motivation are essential features for having the right people, with the right skills, in the right places at the right time. Thus, we agree with Bramhamss view that HRP has a wider meaning, encompassing soft HR issues and it is the whiz that is accepted for the purpose of this text. 3. The growth of HRP Since the origins of the modern industrial organization, human resource planning has been a management feed (Walker, 1980).Division of labour, specialization, organization of management into levels, work si mplification, and application of standards for selecting employees and measuring their exploit were all principles applied early in industrial management (Ibid). Planning for the staffing of work to be done is not something that has become popular in recent long time. This is something that has gr amaze to become what it is today. The relatively sophisticated techniques for sale to management today are outcomes of a long period of evolution in practices, which started decades ago with simple, pragmatic, short term planning.The techniques used by management tended to tot contemporary conditions and events (Storey, 1995). During the early part of the 20th century, for example, the focus in men planning was upon the hourly production worker. The aim of improving efficiency done work engineering and early industrial psychology applications was consistent with the sine qua non to improve productivity and introduce abundanter objectivity to personnel practices (Ling, 1965 Merril, 1959 Yoder 1952). During the countenance human War and the post war years, the focus intensified on employee productivity.There was also great concern regarding the avail might of competent managerial personnel, as there was a talent shortage in combination with world-shaking submit for goods and services. New technologies and interests in behavioural aspects of work also added complexities to the workforce planning task. In the 1960s the demand for high talent personnel increased due to high technology programmers, rapid embodied involution and diversification. In come in to handle this increase, work force planning practices were focused on balancing offer with demand, particularly demand for managerial, professional and proficient personnel.According to textbooks indite during the later part of the 1960s, manpower planning was viewed as a scheme linking the organization with its environment (Patten, 1969 Vetter, 1967). Walker (1980) argues that the most commons vie w of manpower planning at that time, which also dominated the literature until the 80s, was that companies forecast their inescapably for manpower into the future, forecast their versed labour supply for meeting these haves, and identify the gaps between what exit be directed and what ordain be available. Further, manpower planners develop plans for recruiting, selecting and placing new employees, provide for fosterage and culture and anticipate necessary promotions and transfers (Burack et al, 1972 Geisler, 1967 Henemann et al, 1968 Wikstrom, 1971). The 70s came with new legislation, court decisions and governmental regulations. Management attention then suffercelled to affirmative action planning and other aspects of abidance. enchantment many companies follow the techniques that had been introduced by leading companies during the previous decades, ther experimented with new tools such as calling planning, activity analysis, and reshaping of work (Walker, 1980). The major(ip)ity of companies, however, were chiefly concerned about the compliance with the signifi bunst new regulations governing discrimination, safety and pensions. Generally, it was an un primed(p)tled decade, during which managers had to deal with the competency crisis, uncertain costs and profits, the slowing of business expansion and the increased concern regarding womens liberation and reverse discrimination (Bramham, 1994).However, correspond to Bramham, it was during this time or decade that manpower planning was broadly being termed human resource planning and became widely established as a staff activity in major business and governmental organizations (Ibid). The term human resource planning implied a scope broader than just supply-demand balancing or quantitative calculate. Human resource planning shifted focus from being a quantitative approach, although recognizing its immensity, to a more comprehensive view of the process encompassing both(prenominal) needs fo recasting and program forecasting (Ibid).During the 80s and early 90s, human resource management inquiryers and professionals tended to place greater stress on employee attitudes and on the reading of personnel strategies to search for the enhancement of positive employee feelings and commitment (Zeffane and Mayo, 1994). Generally, these strategies overlooked sufficient dousing on the need to control the flow of personnel within and across organizational boundaries (Walker, 1989). According to Richards-Carpenter (1989), this meant that human resource planning took a regressive step in priority placing within the overall human resource management system.However, due to the increasingly uncertain socio-economic climate during the 90s, it was evaluate that the HRP function was to become the focal activity, as it was increasingly becoming an essential function across the organization (Zeffane and Mayo, 1994). Damm and Tengbland (2000) argue that in the future, the role of the HR personnel is to provide and develop an attractive organizational environment in which the respective(prenominal) feels inspired to grow and develop his/her competence.Furthermore, they say that individual organizations go forth not necessarily be responsible for the individuals competence tuition it is rather the individuals tariff to make sure that they develop their competencies in order to attract future employment relationships. The ultimate situation is when the individual feels that the organization provides the best resources available in order for them to grow and develop their competencies.Damm and Tengblad also argue that two real important future working areas, for individually focused personnel work, will be guidance consulting and employee brooking. There will be a need for people who work with professional career service to swear out the individuals with their career planning if the individual will be responsible for their own careers. In a labour market that i s increasingly characterized by time limit employment rather than life long contracts, there will be a constant requirement to link competence demand with competence supply.The employee brokers usher out assist in the process of identifying the different potentials and overlapping between demands since they have a better overview than the individuals have. This could mean that it will inactive be necessary with employees working with personnel-related questions however, much of the strategic personnel work will not be as important since individuals will be responsible for their own competence development (Damm and Tengblad, 2000). 4. The Contemporary Purpose of HRPThe effective HRP can help anticipate potential future difficulties while there is still a choice of action. Forward planning should enable the organization to develop effective personnel strategies related to such activities as enlisting and plectron, training and retraining, management development and career progressi on, transfers and redeployment, early retirements, salary levels, anticipated redundancies, and accommodation requirements. Bramham (1987) presents a more expatiate view of six basic objectives, which are quite similar to those mentioned by Mullins (1996) that is thought to onstitute the purpose of HRP. The stolon objective and a major purpose shadower the use of HRP is to yield an organization a broad, forward-looking insight into not just the proceeds of employees, solely also the type, skills, and attri alonees of the people that will be needed in the future. HRP provides the in reboundation on which recruiters base their activities and it reveals what gaps there are between the demand for and supply of people with particular skills (Bramham, 1987 Storey, 1995 Mullins, 1996).The second objective aims to reveal what training and development activities need to be undertaken to ensure that existing employees and new recruits birth the required skills at the right time. The lo nger and more specialized the training is, the more significant accurate HRP is to the organizations effective functioning (Bramham, 1987). hands costing is listed as the third objective and explains how HRP assists in cost step- charge by aiming to work out in advance how organizational operations can be staffed most efficiently.This is of even more importance when new ventures or projects are considered because it provides information on which to base snappy decisions (Bramham, 1987). The fourth objective presented by Bramham (1987) is redundancy. HRP is an important tool in the first moment of future redundancies and therefore allows remedial action to be taken, such as recruitment freezes, retraining, and early retirements so as to reduce the numbers involved. another(prenominal) advantage associated with HRP, presented as the fifth objective, is collective bargaining.In organizations with a strong do by join presence, HRP provides important information for use in the ba rgaining process. It is particularly significant when long-term deals are being negotiated to improve productivity and efficiency. In such situations, the information provided by HR forecasts enables calculations to be made concerning how great an increase in pay or how great a reduction in hours might be conceded in exchange for more productive working methods and processes (Bramham, 1987).The sixth and last objective presented as a purpose of HRP deals with the planning of accommodations, such as future need for office space, car parking, and other workplace facilities. much(prenominal) contexts are of great importance, especially to organizations expecting fast expansion or contraction of key operations. As with the other quintuplet objectives described above, HRP also here aims at controlling costs over the long term by forecasting the future (Bramham, 1987). 5. External and inner(a) Influences on HRP 5. 1External Influences on HRPA lot of things have changed from when HRP first gained widespread popularity. The stability of the smooth sailing years, as Champ (1995) refers to the age of US bodied domination between 1948 and 1973 is gone. Todays dynamic environment, filled with globose competition and business discontinuities, define the arena in which HRP must flourish. The need for analysis of changing scenarios, therefore, has to be an integral part of the HRP process (Rothwell 1995). The first step in HRP is usually the environmental scan.If this review has not already been carried out in some depth as part of the formulation of corporate strategy, consideration of precise trends whitethorn be a major contribution, which the HRM function can make to the organization (Institute of Personnel Management 1992). The evolution internationalization of business in the face of changing patterns of world trade, the emersion of new competitors and new markets and changes in the older industrialized countries, all have some impact on the labour markets of even the smallest firm occupation in national market (Taylor, 1998).Most large and medium-sized companies are, however, likely to be merchandise internationally (Rothwell 1995) in some way and will need to guess the labour markets in those countries, if they are to recruit staff abroad or if they expect to send their own staff to work there. The whole issue of international management development has major implications for strategic planning and for human resource forecasting and implementation. Evidence so far suggests that there are many inadequacies in both planning and implementation of management mobility, and that there is a widespread reliance on ad hoc use of dismiss managers (Ibid. 995). International and political issues are clearly closely linked, the move towards greater European unity, the unification of East and West Germany, the opening of Eastern Europe, The World Trade Centre bombings etc. , are just a a couple of(prenominal) examples of events with implicati ons for business planning. The political complexion of a government tends to affect the type of economic policy in place, the attitude to full employment, trade union and employee rights, as well as the level of support for private or public sector enterprises.External political factors, especially the broader social and regulatory legacies of industrial relations, provide a socio-political context in which managerial strategies have had to develop, and by which they have been conditioned (Lucio and Simpson 1992). At a time of economic recession in particular, the costs of worker protection policies can be very(prenominal) costly for companies. An knowingness of population trends is critical in reasonableness labour markets, and national population statistics are readily available.Rothwell further states that planning to take account of demographic trends is not a good deal done early enough. Also, a neglect of advance planning tends to increase labour costs, as firms have to i ncrease wages and salaries in order to retain staff or poach them from other firms. Public policy emphasis on training, the co-ordination of a plethora of national vocational qualifications, and the setting of national education training targets all mean that some aspects of estimating outside(a) competence supply will be improved.Data on graduate qualifications are readily available, but rendering likely trends in supply and demand is complex (Pike et al. 1992). Demand-side factors stem chiefly from business strategy, but need to take account of other skills that whitethorn be needed for example in physical environmental awareness and the implications for products or processes and energy use or in marketing, in concepts of relative marketing, customer education and general supply chain management. If mergers or acquisitions are expected, is new expertise needed to handle that?Or if organization structures are changing to create flatter organizations or new internationalized bus iness market divisions, are there skills available in managing networks, managing projects or managing cross-culturally? Firms that use competence-mapping techniques may be able to provide data relevant to HRP, but where these activities are done by different people and/or at different locations, such linkage cannot be made (Rothwell, 1995). Consumer attitudes tend to be surveyed more regularly than those of employees, but shifts in employee preferences are perceptible, often on a generation basis.The generation of people born in the 70s and 80s are more individualistic, less likely to accept authority, expecting to have a say and be tending(p) a choice, and also to be putting more emphasis on quality of leisure and family life. The priority perks for those in work are those related to health and to education and training. Employees are also less likely to remain with one employer. These attitudes are found particularly among knowledge-workers, and may be modified over-time by expe rience of recession and widespread white-collar unemployment (Rothwell, 1995).If a major difference between HRP and manpower planning lies in its emphasis on motivating people (Bramham 1989), understanding the starting point and The internalisation of both individual and organizational needs is therefore the major challenge for HR planners and should be reflected in the application of the planning process to the ways in which people are employed (Ferner and Colling 1991) 5. 2Internal Influences on HRP Zeffane and Mayo (1994) argue that in the context of the supply-demand equation, a range of internal factors require consideration for the purpose of evaluating existing (or anticipated) supply from within the organization.The supply side issues that HRP should address include the organizations policy on growth from within or by means of outside recruitment the policy on pay and remuneration, and the organizations view on employee development. In this context, the effected human res ource plans take into consideration a series of supply side statistics, such as company growth, the age distribution of employees, skill levels, turnover ratios and the overall profile/distribution of employment across project categories.Zeffane and Mayo (1994) further state that among all these, age and retirement are emerging as important considerations in workforce planning in the current socio-economic climate. These factors (i. e. age and retirement) are strongly related in the disposition that retirement takes place on the attainment of a certain age. supply for age is necessary and is becoming increasingly the subject of a more elaborate mathematical modeling for workforce (Mohapatra et al. 1990). The more contemporary approaches to HRP need to consider current (and anticipated/future) changes in the make-up and aspirations of the workforce.Long-term macro-level forecasts seem to suggest that people in the future will have even greater desire for self-development and disco very (Taylor, 1998). These aspirations may trigger requirements for changes in existing corporate structures and management systems. As a result, human resource professionals and their organizations may capitalise on the advantage of potential employees who may be creative and self-motivated, but they will also face the problem of developing an environment that will attract and hold such individuals (Taylor 1998). 6.Different Types of Human Resource Planning 6. 1Succession Planning One adaptation of traditional HRP that takes place mostly in larger organizations is the development of a episode planning function. Storey (1995) argues that chief executives often see this function as the major rational for any form of HRP. While in some organizations it may be focused in the main on the few top positions, the need to consider at least(prenominal) a five-year-period can mean that it becomes a more significant operation, and at long last drives a whole management recruitment and dev elopment programme.According to Taylor (1998), succession planners are mainly interested in ensuring that their employer has enough individuals with the right abilities, skills and experience to invoke into key senior jobs, as they become vacant. According to Jackson and Schuler (1990), succession planning differs from traditional HRP in the sense that the succession planning process covers a narrower group of employees but does so with a higher stage of intensity. As succession plans concern relatively few employees, they can be considerably more sophisticated the time span is also longer than that of traditional HRP.Succession plans often involve forecasting and planning the progress of individuals 20 years ahead or more (Walker, 1992, Storey, 1995). Storey (1995) argues that succession planning is most often associated with hierarchical organizations in which individuals develop careers by piteous upwards and sideways over a number of years as they acquire the required skills and experience. The aim of this is to ensure that enough individuals with the potential to advance to senior positions are available when an appointment needs to be made.Rothwell (1994) states that third candidates are typically identified for each senior post one who is ready now and could succeed immediately if necessary one who will be ready, if needed, in two or 3 years time and one who will be ready in five years time. Taylor (1998) comments, in addition, succession planners have an input into decisions about the numbers of graduates that are employed on graduate training programmers each year. In technical terms, succession planning involves collecting and manipulating data about individuals and tracking their operation and progress as they move from job to job over a period of time. . 2Career Planning This type of HRP is by some viewed as a more fashionable term to use than succession planning and plainly is more individually focused (Storey, 1995). Furthermore, like suc cession planning, broadly interpreted, it requires an understanding of processes that can integrate an individuals characteristics and preferences with the implications of organizational culture, values and style, business strategy and direction, organizational structure and change, reward systems, training and development system, judgement and promotion systems.According to Taylor (1998), career planning emphasizes much more on the individuals responsibility for his/her own career development. Mentoring and coaching systems, whether formal or informal, may be introduced to assist in this. Storey (1995) argues that common problems associated with this conformation of planning are related to key people sledding, or to managers lack of broad experience. The requirements of different types of organizations ( stable fast growing international etc. ) for detailed planning clearly vary (Ibid).Storey further states that the need for creating bridges between different occupations and for the identification of development positions, are both significant techniques in career planning. The predominant influence of this type of planning is that of the organizations needs, as interpreted by particular managers, at certain phases of its development and it is said that career planning may be interpreted very differently by those who experience it (Storey, 1995). Storey continues to say that the myths of the organization in this sense may also be significant those who decode them befittingly are those who obtain advancement. 6. 3 calamity Planning Contingency planning is seldom given any attention by authors within the HR field, but gibe to Taylor (1998), it can be seen as an approach that is almost universally applicable. Contingency planning involves planning possible responses to a variety of potential environmental scenarios, and the result is that HRP effectively switches from being a reactive process undertaken in order to assist the organization in achieving its a ims. Taylor further argues that it becomes a proactive process undertaken prior to the formulation of wider organizational objectives and strategies.The main purpose of eventuality planning in the HR field is the provision of information on which decisions about the future directions the organization takes are made (Taylor, 1998). 6. 4Competency Planning other adaptation of traditional HRP is skills planning and is, according to Speechly (1994), particularly appropriate in situations where there is a variety of different methods by which employee needs can be met. The basic principle of this method is to shift away from a focus on planning for people and instead concentrate mainly on skills.Taylor (1998) argues that instead of forecasting the future supply of and demand for employees, skills planning involves predicting what competencies will be needed one to five years ahead, hence, leaving open the question of the form in which these will be obtained. Further, skills-based plans consist the possibility that skills needs are to be met either wholly or partially through the employment of short-term employees, outside consultants, as well as by permanent members of staff (Taylor, 1998). . 5 leisurely Human Resource Planning There has been some disagreement in the literature over the term soft human resource planning and its perceived meaning (Taylor, 1998). Marchington and Wilkinson (1996) give one broad definition as being synonymous with the whole subject of human resource management. Torrington and Hall (1995) have a narrower definition involving planning to meet soft HR goals particularly cultural and behavioral objectives.Torrington and Hall also use the label to give meaning to a distinct range of HR activities which are similar to hard HRP in approach, but with a focus on forecasting the likely supply and demand for particular attitudes and behaviors rather than people and skills. According to Taylor (1998) soft HRP can thus be seen as a broadening o f the objectives associated with the traditional approaches of HRP. Soft HRP accepts that for organizations to succeed in the current environment they need more than the right people in the right place at the right time.In order to contribute to the creation of a successful organizational culture, they also need to make sure that people have an appropriate outlook and set of attitudes. Further, even more essentially argued by Taylor, by undertaking dictatorial soft HRP Organizations will be alert to long-term shifts in attitudes to work among the Labour force in general, allowing them to build these considerations into their general planning processes. Such issues are not taken into account by traditional HRP according to Taylor (1998). . Conclusions Regardless of the organizational size and industry the underlying motive behind HRP is to have the right people, with the right skills, in the right places, at the right time. However, the ways to realize this motive do differ from one organization to another depending on the individual prerequisites. This could be illustrated by breaking down the motive, where finding the right people, with the right skills is the essential condition for having them at the right place, at the right time.In times of organizational growth or downsize organizations naturally focus on hiring or retaining the right people with the right skills. However, organizations with a modest employee turnover can focus more on having the people in the right place i. e. concentrating more on qualification sure that the existing workforce is utilized in the optimal way. While there are different prerequisites between organizations, determining their approach to plan, we can also see a general change affecting the ability for all organizations to plan.Historically, there has been turbulence in the business environment such as technological developments and erratic economic fluctuations, however it is not these factors per se that has caused the change today, but rather the speeds in which discontinuities clear. This is made evident by the fact that companies no longer plan in the same way as they did ten to fifteen years ago when the more static conditions allowed the organizations to plan with more accuracy.Today organizations do not plan more than three years ahead and the plans are revised both annually and quarterly. This development has put the organizations in a dilemma the greater the need for planning the more difficult it becomes to plan. In the light of this, some theorists question planning since it is virtually impossible to foresee changes with any accuracy. However, this view appears to have little, if any relevance among the organizations, where planning is viewed as a less formal process.The common understanding among the companies is that it is impossible to follow a plan rigorously but they still plan. From this we draw the conclusion that planning is more than just forecasting the future, it is rather t he planning process itself that adds value to the organization. By incorporating plans made across the whole range of personnel and development activity the organization becomes more alert to changes and prepares itself for future discontinuities regardless of their nature, thus admitting that change will occur is more important than foreseeing the future.Organizations that embrace this way of thinking plan to a greater extent than in the past in the way that it involves a broader definition of HRP, incorporating not only quantitative measures but also soft issues. However, the fact is that environments vary across industries, organizations and over time. Some organizations occasionally experience disruption. But at the same time others are experiencing relative stability. Thus, organizations are very much influenced by their individual prerequisites limiting their abilities to plan to the extent as described above.Two findings concerning HRP seems to distinguish themselves, firstly we can see a general change among all companies in the way they plan for HR, secondly HRP is still very much based on individual prerequisites. 8. abridgment Human resource planning is probably one of the most critical elements in linking the work of the human resources function to the business goals of the company. It is important to agnise that certain aspects of human resource management tend to have potentially high strategic consequences.Especially in the areas of policy development and implementation it is pellucid and difficult to refute advice that effective human resource policies require human resource planning, which in turn, requires effective integration with an organizations strategic planning process. It is evident that human resources planning are becoming more and more important in business circles. Because business profits are squeezed by inflation and a weakened economy, management is also concerned with personnel costs and is seeking to achieve increased out put with the same or fewer staff.During our research we have found evidence encouraging the above statement, where organizations with a high employee turnover tend to focus on the planning for supply and demand of HR, while organizations with low employee turnover ply more towards internal issues of HRP. Logically counting heads becomes more important in times of growth or downsizing, thus the nature of the HRP shifts towards a quantitative approach. Consequently organizations experiencing more stable periods can focus on softer HRP, i. e. concentrating on the creation of an environment that stimulates personal development and motivation among the employees.Our impression during the research is that all companies have the intention to focus more on internal HRP, thus companies do not decide to be either quantitative or qualitative in their approach, and it is rather a natural selection based on the individual prerequisites. However, we can see a jeopardize with not having a balan ced view in terms of external and internal HRP. Among the companies with an explicit internal focus there is a lack of attention for external developments and trends, thus we can see an inherent run a risk of becoming fat and happy which in turn requires reactive actions in times of major change.References Beer, S. (1972). Brain of the Firm, New York, Herder and Herder. Beer, S. (1974). Designing Freedom. Toronto CSC Publications. Bell, D. J. (1989). wherefore workforce Planning is Back in Vogue. Personnel Management, (July). Bramham, J. (1987). hands Planning, In S Harper (ed. ) Personnel Management vade mecum. London Gower. Bramham, J. (1988). pragmatical Manpower Planning, in Harper, S (ed) Personnel Management Handbook. London. Gower. Bramham, J. (1994). Human Resource Planning. (2nd Eds). London. IPD. Ferner, A. , & Colling, T. , (1991). Privatisation, Regulation and Industrial traffic British Journal of Industrial Relations 29(3), September Gratton, L. , Hailey, V. H, Stiles, P. & Truss, C. (1999). strategical Human Resource Management Corporate elaborateness and Human Reality. Oxford University Press Inc, New York. Gustafsson, J, Leijon, S & Targama, A. (1978). Synpunkter pa Personalplanering. Kompendiet Lindome. Hedberg, B. L. T. , Bystrom, P. C. & Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Camping on the Seesaws Prescriptions for a Self-Designed Organisation. Administrative Science Quarterly. , Vol. 21, Issue 1 (Mar) pp. 41-65 Henemann, & Selzer. 1968). Manpower Planning and Forecasting in the Firm An Exploratory Problem? Office of Manpower Policy, Evaluation and Research, U. S. Dept. of Labor, March. Herriot, P. (1992). The Career Management Challenge Balancing Individual and Organisational Needs. keen Publications Ltd. London Hollinshead, G. & Leat, M. (1995). Human Resource Management An International and Comparative Perspective. pitman Publishing. Mintzberg, H. (1976). Planning on the Left-side and Managing on the Right-side. Harvard Busi ness Review. (July-August). Mintzberg, H. (2000). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, New York. Prentice Hall. Mullins. L. J. (1996). Management and Organisational Behaviour. (4th Ed). Pitman Publishing UK. Mumford, A. (1997). Management instruction Strategies for Action. (3rd ed. ). Short Rum Press Ltd. Rothwell, W. J. , (1994) Effective Succession Planning. American Management Association, New York. Rothwell, S. (1995). Human Resource Planning. In J Storey (ed. ) Human Resource Management A Critical Text. London. Routledge. Schneider, L. (1962). The Role of the Category of Ignorance in Sociological Theory An Exploratory Statement. American Sociological Review, 27 pp. 492-508 Speechly, N. (1994). incertitude Principles. Personnel Today (May) Starbuck, W. H. (1965). Organisational Growth and victimisation In J. G. March (ed. ), Handbook of Organisations pp. 451-533. Chicago Rand McNally. Starbuck, W. H. (1975). Information Systems for Organisations of the Future. In E. Grochla and N. Szyperski (eds. ), Information Systems and Organisational Structure pp. 217-229. New York de Gruyter. Taylor, S. (1998). raft and Organisations, Employee Resourcing. The Cronwell Press Ltd, UK. Torrington, D. & Hall, L. (1995). Personnel Management, HRM in Action. Prentice Hall. Walker, J. W. (1989). Human Resource Roles for the 90s. Human Resource Planning, 12. 1 pp. 55-61 Walker, J. W. (1992), Human Resource Strategy. New York McGrawHill. Wickesberg, A. (1961). Organisational Relationships in the Small Manufacturing Firm. Minneapolis University of Minnesota. Wilson, B. (1987). Manpower Planning of Future Requirements. International Journal of Manpower Planning. Yoder, D. , (1952). Personnel Principles and Policies. Prentice Hall,Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Zeffane, R. & Mayo, G. (1994). Planning for Human Resources in the 1990s Development of an Operational Model. University of New Castle, New South Wales, Australia.