Art - A Culturally Constructed Myth :: American Culture Essays

Art - A Culturally Constructed MythThe development of semiotics in the 20th century revealed much about ideology in portion culture. Structuralist Roland B stratagemhes texts on the matter are very much products of their times, as yet many still have a troubling modern-day relevance. Barthes Mythologies demonstrates the possibilty to come on pixilateding through the trivia of everyday life. He claims to want to challenge the innoncence and naturalness of pagan texts and practices, as they are capable of producing a multitude of supplementary kernels, or connotations.Although objects, gestures and practices have a certain utilitarian function, they are not repellent to the imposition of meaning. Barthes wants to suspend consideration of function, and concentrate rather on what things mean and how they function as signs. Mythologies is a study of the ways in which mass culture constructs this fableological reality and encourages conformity to its own values.Barthes analysis of signs reveals that thither are very few innoncent objects, that almost everything is coded (assigned meaning). Barthes arrives at this conclusion base on his theory of myth that a form (expanded from Saussures sound-image, which was limited to linguistics) and a concept create mythologies sign systems that figure wizard dominant meaning (or signification). For the receiver, this signification arrives automatically and smoothly, thus seemingly denying the intentional re-coding. Barthes believes that this constant groundwork of myth is how a culture invents its beliefs and narratives, and is able to find meaning in the world.This premise draws a particular parallel in our contemporary beau monde for it is my hypothesis that our culture now locates meaning through mythological art (whether fine, commercial, popular, industrial etc.). Has art truly become myth?In allege to read or deconstruct myth, Barthes suggests, one must (1) accept the myth as a cultural construction, thus emp tying its meaning (2) rear the myth as full, identifying all thinkable signs and significations and finally (3) recognize the signifier as both empty and full, capable of signifying many things, yet with only one clear, dominant meaning. It is my argument that such a deconstruction can render art as myth.Having realized art as a organise cultural phenomenon, and having emptied its direct and apparent meaning, it is possible to identify all its possible significations. Interestingly enough, I find that art reveals many diametrically unlike significations expression and oppression, bias and acceptance, individual and society, creativity and confinement, and freedom and convention, among others. Art signifies the de-politicization of our culture, for flush the most political of pieces cease to cause a stir among the masses.