Cognitive behavioral therapy

I pull up stakes present a summary of both draw neares followed by critical reflection upon their exceptive origins, similarities, differences and usage in practice. Carl Rogers, originator of the person- touch approach, conceived it in the late 1 sass at a time when the healing(p) establishment was dominated by psychoanalysis, which holds that psychological problems direct from childhood fixations and biological drives buried in the unconscious mind, and behaviorism, which focuses on the annalistic mechanism of habits under developed as a reaction to stimuli.Rogers disagreed with these approaches conception of the knob as weak or broken and the therapist as the expert with the tools to fix him Cashmere, 201 1). Conversely, the person-centered approach is thought to be grow in three inter associate philosophies (Cashmere, 2011 humanism, existentialism and phenomenology. Humanism is fundament all(a) toldy a belief in the dignity and worth of each individualist, and that each person is engaged in a throw together towards ego-actualization, I. E. Fulfillment of potential in close to way, which should be acknowledged and respected.Existentialism holds that at that place is no objective loyalty or meaning and that humans are therefore condemned to be free, with follow responsibility for creating meaning in our individual lives, and homogeneity is a link up method of social/philosophical enquiry concerned with mind the indwelling reality experienced by each individual. Drawing on these influences, Rogers developed a number of key tenets of person-centered counseling, three of which he dubbed the core conditions of remedial change.These are that, archetypically, the therapist experiences unconditional optimistic regard for the client the client is do to tonicity that e very(prenominal)thing he feels and expresses is equally acceptable, important and valued. Secondly, the therapist experiences an empathic disposition of he client, which instrum ent that as the client is talking, the therapist accurately senses his savours and personal values including those he may not be directly aware of.Thirdly, the therapists unconditional collateral regard and empathic understanding essential be effectively conveyed to the client (Rogers, 1957, cited in Ballasting Dykes, 2010). Page 1 of 6 These tenets serve to emphasis the voice of the therapist in facilitating the clients achievement of self-actualization - nice a psychologically mature bounteous who is at ease with their experiences and trusts their own inner sources to help them cope with difficulties. As in phenomenology, the therapist is concerned with understanding the world as sensed by the client.To work within the core conditions, a therapist must act as another human being rather than an expert and must avoid projecting his own personal meanings onto the clients situation at all costs, although he should remain aware of them as fragment of his own humanity. Rogers scheme is that the cure family kindred, rather than any specific technique or treatment, will itself facilitate change. He believed that any diagnosis or goal-setting only objectifies clients, and that individual meanings should be treated as the highest authority (Ballasting Dykes, 2010).The person-centered approach similarly offers a theory explaining the origins of unbearable turned on(p) distress. Where there is a conflict mingled with how a person feels, or is (the organism self) and how he thinks he should feel, or be (the self-concept), the result is in congruence. When a person is incongruent, he is experiencing thoughts and feelings that are unimaginable according to his self-concept. This results in the employment of deference mechanisms much(prenominal) as repression, aberrance or menial of feelings, alongside escalating confusion and unhappiness.In person- centered counseling, the therapist models congruence he is being himself and his experiences match what h e communicates to the client and his unconditional positive regard is intended to help the client begin to accept all aspects of himself and so drive towards congruence (Ballasting Dykes, 2010). Mindfulness, contrastingly, is not primarily a therapy in itself (although there are types of therapy based solely upon Buddhist teachings) but rather a method of dealing with despicable which has been integrated into several types f therapy, notably cognitive-behavioral therapy (CB).An integral develop of Buddhist philosophy, mindfulness is a translation of a Pail word meaning recollection. To recollect an awareness of the present moment operator observing, without judgment, present thoughts, feelings, sensations and wider context. Crucially, this includes any kind of emotional discomfort or suffering. It is posited that many another(prenominal) people strive to keep themselves feeling safe, protecting themselves from the things they fear and attempt to attain the things they value and desire.People crave what they dont form and grasp onto what they do -? forming emotional attachments to thought processs, possessions or people in do to distract themselves from the reality of life, which is that it involves suffering and will end in death (Barker, 2010). Hayes (2005, cited in Barker, 2010) uses the language psychological quicksand to describe the way we mint sink deeper into our feelings when we try to struggle against them. To struggle Page 2 of 6 against uncomfortable feelings, whether by distracting ourselves or by trying to force them to change, only deepens and exacerbates conflict and anguish.Furthermore, when controlling or avoiding feelings does not work and we are arced to acknowledge them, we may over-identify with them, dupe them as permanent and feel trapped within them. Acceptance is the first essential fragment of mindfulness instead of feeling sad more or less feeling sad, the alternative is to accept difficult feelings, gently and curiou sly, as only part of the whole moment. Being present is the second element this involves striving, through with(predicate) practice, to focus our attention upon the present moment.Ruminating over the past may result in our processing current thoughts and feelings as part Of an overall narrative, which impedes our understanding hem purely for what they are, and focusing on future goals prevents us from visual perception that we will never be to the full satisfied happiness can only be in the endeavourer, in the present moment. The third element is awareness. Becoming deeply aware of thoughts and thought processes means that we avoid becoming carried away by automatic processes at the expense of reason and control.Mindfulness is often beneficial using meditation but can be employed as part of therapy or in the context of day-to-day activities (Barker, 2010). The more or less salient(ip) similarity to note IS the plangency betwixt the mindfulness-related expression psychological quicksand and the person- centered concept of incongruence. Essentially, both approaches locate the cause of suffering in the deviation between how people truly feel, or truly are, and how they believe they should feel or should be.Accordingly, both approaches advocate acceptance and legitimating of all parts of the self, although the person-centered approach perceives this as being facilitated by the therapeutic relationship, whereas in mindfulness it occurs as a result of practicing acceptance, being present and awareness via techniques such as dedication. Shown (1996, cited in Barker, 2010) argues that it was the resonance between some humanistic and Buddhist ideas that led to Buddhism rising popularity in Western culture since the 1 sass mindfulness theories applied in the West are thus at least somewhat related to the humanist approach.Certainly the two approaches share a belief in phenomenological subjectivity and the harmfulness Of hierarchical, inflexible doctrines. Howev er, at first glance, mindfulness may turn up more ideologically-based. Where the person-centered approach focuses on the individualized organism self failing to celestial orbit the self concept, mindfulness takes a firmer stance in that it emphasizes the harmfulness of all craving or grasping, in all human beings, as a denial of the realities of suffering and death. Page 3 of 6 These aspects of the two approaches get along diametrically opposed.Should suffering people focus on themselves, or should they move towards focusing on the whole context surrounding them in order to gain perspective? Mann Bazaar is a person-centered therapist who, more lately, has coordinated mindfulness techniques as part of his practice (Bazaar, 2009). He emphasizes the erosion of self that a mindful examination of the self can ring somewhat What meditation eventually does to one person is to leave ones identity That destroys the very foundation of our western society which is founded on ego, on self , on acquiringThe more Im aware, the more I look around, the more I hold in the full implication of suffering (Open University, 201 AAA). Barker (2010) similarly argues that being in a state of mindful awareness is an appropriate foundation for action, and that letting go of craving and grasping lessens selfish behavior in relationships. The person-centered approach has attracted censure for supposedly being theory-thin (Cashmere, 201 1). However, as has been shown, it is rooted in humanism, existentialism and phenomenology, and was developed as a challenge to the authoritarian, dogmatic approaches that were prominent at the time.Carl Rogers is overwhelmingly regarded as the al some influential figure in the therapy field, even among practitioners of cognitive-behavioral therapy (Barber, 2007, cited in Ballasting Dykes, 201 0) regardless Of approach, most practitioners today recognize the importance of the relationship between therapist and client, as well as the need to create e quilibrium within this relationship rather than allowing the therapist to Edgar him or herself as the expert (Kowtow and Saffron, 2007).Pinker (2011) argues that the evolution of value systems in the direction of humanism has been a momentous general historical trend. Person-centered counseling, which reveres the inbred worth and inalienable rights of the individual and disdains arbitrary authority in favour of a more egalitarian outlook, rose to prominence as part of this trend. Pinker contends that, since the end of the Second World War, humanism has been the unquestioned foundation of most Western peoples values so much so that it is easy to draw a blank it is a theory.The historical significance of humanism in general, and Carl Rogers in particular, should not be discounted. However, since Rogers theories were developed in the sass, it seems timely to examine them and question whether they office be refined. Wood (2008) highlights some criticisms that have been made in recen t years May (1982, cited in Wood, 2008) took Rogers to task for asserting the sovereign emancipation of the individual and then blaming society for the individuals woes.The person- centered approach, which takes an extremely positive see of human nature (all humans are engaged in a struggle towards self-actualization, and only deed Page 4 of 6 to be facilitated to achieve their potential), does not adequately address personal responsibility or the collective good. To value and revere an individuals needs above all else is to ignore, for example, ecological problems that result from people proportioning their own wants and needs.In my view, Rogers reverence of the therapeutic relationship is also problematic. To feel and communicate positive regard and empathic understanding to such an extent that the client feels transformed by it, may only be achieved in certain circumstances. Maureen Moore, a preconceived counselor, describes her allegations with a client who was feeling aliena ted from others as a result of being mixed-race Ive experienced some of this myself, so in a sense I was able to be more empathic (Open University, Bibb).The success of the therapeutic relationship may at least partly depend on the therapists experiences and personality compared to the clients, and while this criticism applies to all types of therapy, it is particularly pertinent in the case of an approach which venerates the relationship as the therapy, rather than any technique or process.It may be that the person-centered approach works best n cases where a profound understanding does develop (perhaps as a result of shared experience between the therapist and the client) and/or where the client is new to the experience of being fully listened to and accepted. Overall, I feel more drawn to the mindfulness approach the person-centered idea of accepting the whole self has been refined and conveyed more clearly, without the need for slang such as incongruence, there is less weight p laced upon the therapeutic relationship and it addresses the wider context rather than focusing on the self.Additionally, mindfulness techniques have been hon. to have wide-ranging applications dialectical behavior therapy, for example, is a variant of CB which focuses on patients cognitive styles while simultaneously teaching mindfulness strategies for management of their cordial states, and which evidence suggests is effective for patients with borderline personality disorder. Mindfulness as part of a structured approach may be Of particular do good to people with chaotic inner lives (Roth and F-Nagy, 2005).